Wow. (Tuesday’s) article in the opinions section by Andrew Stith was well written and well argued.

I am beyond impressed. As someone who identifies myself to be heterosexual but not narrow-minded, I appreciate how Mr. Stith’s argument had facts to back up his opinion — and that he did not quote the Bible to discuss an issue concerning “the separation of church and state.”

My favorite quotes include:

— “The question is not “whose perspective has more weight in the argument?”, but rather “what is the legal rationale behind denying marriage equality?”

— “Differing options are both normal and healthy to debate over social and legal values, and I would never berudge any respectful, rational person that difference.”

This article was also well articulated, and well punctuated.

Thank you, Andrew Stith, for being the highlight of my Tuesday.